Jul 17th, 2014
Jul 10th, 2014
Jul 10th, 2014
Jul 7th, 2014
Jul 6th, 2014

Yummmmmmm

Jul 6th, 2014
Jul 5th, 2014
Jul 5th, 2014
proud-atheist:

Not All Views Are Equalhttp://proud-atheist.tumblr.com
Jul 5th, 2014
Jul 5th, 2014

confrontingbabble-on:

"In a newly published interview in the legal magazine California Lawyer, Scalia said that while the Constitution does not disallow the passage of legislation outlawing such discrimination, it doesn’t itself outlaw that behavior

Marcia Greenberger, founder and co-president of the National Women’s Law Center, called the justice’s comments “shocking” and said he was essentially saying that if the government sanctions discrimination against women, the judiciary offers no recourse.

Greenberger added that under Scalia’s doctrine, women could be legally barred from juries, paid less by the government, receive fewer benefits in the armed forces, and be excluded from state-run schools — all things that have happened in the past, before their rights to equal protection were enforced.

"In 1971, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that they were protected, in an opinion by the conservative then Chief Justice Warren Burger," Adam Cohen wrote in Time in September. “It is no small thing to talk about writing women out of equal protection — or Jews, or Latinos or other groups who would lose their protection by the same logic. It is nice to think that legislatures would protect these minorities from oppression by the majority, but we have a very different country when the Constitution guarantees that it is so.”

In 1996, Scalia cast the sole vote in favor of allowing the Virginia Military Institute to continue denying women admission.

Legal scholar Jack Balkin writes that while the 14th amendment doesn’t end up explicitly mentioning sex, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t grant women equal protection”

Read in full  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/03/scalia-women-discrimination-constitution_n_803813.html